Brianna Lyman writes for the Federalist about Democrats’ dubious approach toward election integrity.
In 2016, Democrats launched the Russia Collusion hoax and went so far as to spy on President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign over phony allegations he colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election. According to Democrats, foreign election interference is bad — even when it was entirely fabricated.
Russia collusion hoaxer Adam Schiff said in 2021 that “both parties must speak with one voice to disavow all interference in our elections. We must guard against and seek to deter all attempts at foreign interference, and ensure that American voters decide American elections.”
Then vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris worried in 2020 that “foreign interference” would cost her and Joe Biden the election.
Yet both Schiff and Harris are remarkably quiet when their party is actively engaged in foreign election interference.
The New Yorker did an exposé on Daysi González, a “political consultant who works on campaigns to elect Democrats across the country.” Gonzalez has “helped elect AOC and [Ruben] Gallego” while also consulting the DCCC. She was living in the country under Temporary Protected Status (TPS), which is set to expire Wednesday.
“Her mentor and boss, Chuck Rocha, has been trying to pull all the strings he can to help her stay in the U.S.,” The New Yorker wrote. While Rocha has been unsuccessful in his efforts to keep the El Salvadoran in the United States, he has “offered to keep her as a remote worker.”
In simpler terms, Democrats are using a foreign national to run campaigns currently inside the United States and are reportedly willing to use a foreign national living in a foreign land once her TPS expires — this is after assuring Americans an investigation into Trump in 2016 was necessary because foreign election interference is dangerous and bad.
But the story of González is not an anomaly. Democrats love foreign election interference so long as it helps them.
